Access model

The problem

During incidents, teams often copy text between tools: internal notes, partner messages, public status. That creates inconsistency, oversharing risk, and missing evidence after the incident.

The idea: controlled disclosure

KaxaPage separates what you record from what you publish.

• Internal timeline: complete, detailed, evidence-ready.
• Published views: controlled summaries per audience.

Audiences (examples)

• Internal: full operational detail and decision trail.
• Partners: limited operational context with coordination details.
• Public: safe summary, impact, and next update cadence.

Approvals

A publishable update can require review (e.g., SRE lead, comms, security). The goal: fast updates without unsafe disclosures.

Why this matters

• Reduce accidental leaks (internal identifiers, vendor names, sensitive hypotheses).
• Keep updates consistent and traceable.
• Preserve evidence for audits and post-incident work.